[casual_games] Casual Game Framework

[Tom Hubina]

If anyone tells you that an engine can cleanly support (or even remotely
cleanly) PC, Consoles, and Mobile devices you should look for the snake oil
that he's also selling. More than likely the only "mobile devices" they
support are PDAs and Smartphones and not the hundreds of millions of mobile
phones out there where you can actually make some money ;)
 
You can 100% forget about any kind of all-in-one solution for 2D games. The
only thing close would be 3D stuff, and that represents a tiny portion of
the mobile market right now. But even that's something I would have to call
bullshit on given that so many of the devices don't support things like
floating point, and that you would need an engine that supports both J2ME
(JSR-184) and C++ (BREW/OpenGL ES).
 
And that's just the engine part. Once you factor in the idea that quality
games on mobile are frequently quite a bit different than their PC/Console
counterparts due to user interface, play time expectations, etc you quickly
realize that anyone who says they have an engine that supports all three
from the same code base has never actually made a successful mobile title.
 
(sorry to be harsh, but I've seen a lot of this nonsense going around lately
and no one seems to be countering it)
 
Tom


  _____  

From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org [mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org]
On Behalf Of gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:28 AM
To: 'IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [casual_games] Casual Game Framework



Hi,

 

I agree completely agree with Eric. You really need a full package if you
intend to develop for PC, Consoles, Mobile devices, etc. I recommend that
you give a look at Mobex3D (www.mobex3D.com <http://www.mobex3d.com/> ),
it's a great engine for PC, Mac and mobile devices. It's one of the best
engine available for mobile devices today.

 

Hope this advice helped.

 

Best regards,

David Opresnik 

 


  _____  


Od: casual_games-bounces at igda.org [mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org]
Namesto E. D. Bass
Poslano: 29. maj 2007 16:00
Za: IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List
Zadeva: Re: [casual_games] Casual Game Framework

 

Just wanted to add my 1.0025 cents.

My crew recently ran up against this issue, and choosing a solid dev
package was a good deal more difficult than i had imagined.

I normally don't offer unsolicited advice, so do forgive...

Firstly, think of your long term goal and long term development scheme
if you intend on developing for PC, Console, Mobile devices, or Web-based,
Choose a package that can either do all of those things.

Do get stuck with a package that will cause you headaches when you decided
to
jump platforms. Our solution was TGE for everything but web, and for that we
chose Flash Professional. 

TGE for price, support, community, and the fact that the guys at Garage
Games actually
answer their phones AND give great advice and support. And Flash, because
you just
cannot beat it for fast, fluid, cross compatible game dev.

So, thats my story and I'm sticking to it, good luck Bro.. its all worth
it.. trust me!

Peace and Prosperity,
Eric Bass
Concrete Alchemy Mediaworks


James Terry wrote: 

1-Is there any impact on the selected technology on a Publisher's point of
view? Do they prefer any technology over other?

 

A lot of publishers favor their in-house technology if available, Playground
SDK, PopCap Framework, Torque Game Builder, etc. 

2-What do you think about  XNA for a casual games?

 

Like others have said, XNA hasn't matured yet, and it does not support Mac
at all (which is a large outlet for a casual game)

3-Any experience on using a publishers framework (PopCap Games Framework)
and then publishing with others? 

 

Both the PopCap and Playfirst SDK can be used on projects that end up
getting published through someone else, or even self-published

4-Any other suggestions?

 

Check out Playfirst SDK, PopCap Framework, Torque Game Builder, Unity (if
you have a Mac) and see which one is most useful for what you want to make.

>From what I've seen, its faster to build a Prototype using Unity or TGB

since they have a heavy scripting component while PopCap and Playfirst will
stick you with a lot of C++, but TGB and Unity both cost a bit, while PopCap
and Playfirst are free

 

James R. Terry
Yatec, LLC
11606 Southfork, Suite 300
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
(225) 274-1550 Ext. 136
www.yatecgames.com <http://www.yatecgames.com/> 

 


  _____  


From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org [mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org]
On Behalf Of Kef Sensei
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 9:35 AM
To: casual_games at igda.org
Subject: [casual_games] Casual Game Framework

 

We are an outsourcing company and we are developing our first game of our
own. We are creating a playable demo for submission to publishers and we are
considering sevral technologies.
We have started with XNA hoping to go through Microsoft path but we found
many incompatibilities with Graphic Cards so we are considering other
options such as PopCap Games Framework. 
Some questions:

1-Is there any impact on the selected technology on a Publisher's point of
view? Do they prefer any technology over other?

2-What do you think about  XNA for a casual games?

3-Any experience on using a publishers framework (PopCap Games Framework)
and then publishing with others? 

4-Any other suggestions?

Thanks for the feedback...

Regards
Eli

 





  _____  



 
_______________________________________________
Casual_Games mailing list
Casual_Games at igda.org
http://www.igda.org/casual-subscribe
Archive: http://www.igda.org/casual-subscribe
Archive Search:
http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=010373383720242846960%3Az3tdwggxil8
List FAQ:
http://www.igda.org/wiki/index.php/Casual_Games_SIG/Casual_Games_List_FAQ
  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/casual_games/attachments/20070529/4c328aad/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2681 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/casual_games/attachments/20070529/4c328aad/attachment.jpe>