[Corp. Watch] Demanding human rights on the corporate plantation

Corporation Watch corporation-watch at countercorp.org
Thu Mar 12 16:52:51 EDT 2009


Apartheid in America

by Raj Patel

(Stuffed and Starved blog, March 7) -- I'm back from a trip to visit
the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW) in Florida, as part of a
delegation of food justice activists. Although I'd never been there
before, our guided tour around the town of Immokalee felt familiar.

Immokalee means "my home" in Seminole, and it was peoples' homes that
I'd seen before, in another country. The trailers where tomato-pickers
sleep reminded me of South African townships, filled with densely
packed, low-income houses, built by the government to keep the supply
of black labor close -- but not too close -- to the cities where their
work was required.

Except that the conditions in Apartheid era township houses were
better than in Immokalee.

In Immokalee, the housing stock is largely owned by one family, the
Blockers, who rule over an archipelago of run-down and unsanitary
trailers in which eight people sleep, each queuing up to use the
bathroom every morning and the stove every night, in wretched poverty.
For this, they pay around $40 a week.

If they want an air conditioner, they pay $20 a week more. In one
case, if they wanted a shower to wash a day's worth of pesticides off,
workers were charged $5 to hose down outside. Some workers find it
cheaper and more effective to wash their hands in bleach.

But it's not only in the inhumane living conditions that similarities
to Apartheid are to be found.

Immokalee is in Collier County, in which the largest city is Naples.
That's where Bill Gates, Steven Spielberg, and Donald Trump, among
others, have second (or third) homes. Average family income there is
over $100,000. The walls are high, the golf courses lush and well
patrolled, and the police assiduous in escorting the indigent out of
sight.

On the other side of the county is the source of some the largest
profits in the state. Florida produces 90% of the U.S. winter tomato
supply. Judging from the cars that the crew contractors drive and the
houses they live in, it's a lucrative business.

Their bosses in companies like Pacific Tomato, Six Ls, and Di Mare
certainly earn considerably more -- how much more is hard to tell,
because the tomato corporations aren't publicly listed.

What we do know is that the work for the tomato pickers is irregular,
dependent on the weather, and merciless. A talented picker, one
fortunate enough to be in a field that hasn't yet been picked --
they're picked up to four times, and on the fourth sweep, there's
pitifully little left on the vine -- can fill 150 buckets a day.

That adds up to about 2.4 tons of tomatoes, which will be sold in
stores for approximately $5,000.

If they're lucky, they'll get a wage of 40 cents per 32-pound bucket
of green tomatoes -- or about $60 for 12 hours of work. The wage that
hasn't changed since 1978. Back then, you'd need to fill eight buckets
of tomatoes an hour to equal the state's minimum wage. Now you'd need
to fill 17 buckets.

Workers have a tough time of it beyond the living conditions and
abysmal wages. Some of them are literally modern-day slaves. Over
1,000 people have been freed from slavery by Florida law enforcement
officers since 1997, with their captors prosecuted under the same laws
that were written in the wake of Abolition.

In the most recent case, 12 slaves escaped from the back of a locked-
up truck where they'd been held captive. "Of course, I say any
instance is too many, and any legitimate grower certainly does not
engage in that activity," the governor's press officer said, "but
you're talking about maybe a case a year."

There's yet another similarity to apartheid. Whites in South Africa
practiced a special sort of self-deception, a belief that there were
two worlds, hermetically sealed from one another for the benefit of
both sides. To this end, high walls also served a psychological
purpose, providing layers of deniability and ignorance fostered by
distance.

Yet, when it suited those in power, the two worlds could be
conjoined, parasitically. In South Africa, that bridge was the use of
black workers to provide industrial, agricultural, and domestic labor
and thereby generate wealth. A similar story might be told in Florida.

Most of the time, not a thought is paid by the tomato growers to the
treatment of their workers, kept hidden from sight and mind like step-
children in the basement. But from time to time, we all live together
in one big sharing happy family.

Over Christmas, while Congress was in recess, the Florida Tomato
Growers Exchange, comprising companies that routinely buy produce from
slave labor (one writer suggests that any given U.S. winter tomato is
produced with slave labor), approached the government for a $100
million bail-out. This, apparently, was in the public interest.

Only through the actions of Sen. Bernie Sanders (Independent -
Vermont) that the bail-out was blocked because, as Sanders' press
secretary said, "the senator had a problem with a government bail-out
for folks who wink at slavery and can't figure out a way to let other
people pay their pickers a penny a pound more for their back-breaking
labor."

How did Sanders come to take such an aggressive position? It's
because the CIW campaigned hard in order to get their plight noticed.
From its inception in 1993, the CIW has grown into a powerful voice
for workers, with major victories that include a deal with Taco Bell
and McDonald's, which buy millions of tomatoes from the growers.

In 2003, the CIW won the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights award. I've
recently been involved in work on human rights and have reservations
about them as a vehicle for social change, so I asked CIW member Lucas
Benitez why they tout human rights in the U.S., where rights are
limited to claims about civil rights, like the right to free speech:


> "Rights are not new to us [Benitez said]. We didn't get off the boat

> and find ourselves in the land of rights. We come from countries

> like Mexico, Haiti, and Guatemala, where we have been using this

> language of rights many years in our own struggles. And here in

> America, we are not asking for anything that isn't already a right."

>

> "When there are cases of modern-day slavery here, the people who are

> rounded up aren't just [illegal immigrants]. A 2001 slavery case

> involved African Americans who were recruited from homeless shelters

> and rehab centers to work in the tomato fields, and then sold

> cocaine and crack from a 'company store' that kept them always in

> debt. They were U.S. citizens."

>

> "What we're asking for is the right to a fair wage, for just pay for

> work done, for the right not to be robbed, for the right to

> organize, which has always been denied to farmworkers. Aren't these

> civil rights? Sadly, the U.S. public thinks rights are respected

> here, which is why they don't know how to ask for them."


It's all well and good to demand rights, I said, but how did they
expect to get them when the government was so tilted against them?
Straight away, Lucas shot back with a quotation from abolitionist and
former slave Frederick Douglass.

" 'Power concedes nothing without demand'," Benitez said. "We have
been excluded from organizing, but these are our rights, so we have to
fight. We're not asking for a CEOs pay -- we're just asking for our
dignity."

Then I asked about conflict, and whether this was the best way to get
something done -- surely rights are a cooperative approach to fixing a
problem, and since the CIW is a non-violent organization, conflict
isn't appropriate.

"Conflict is everywhere,' he said. "In a marriage, there's always
conflict. Conflict isn't bad -- it's natural. We're taking on those
people with power. But you've got to look for routes to the rights you
want. That's what we're doing today. We use direct action, dialogue,
and imagination in our conflict with corporations, to get our rights."

They don't use violence, just conflict. Give me an example, I asked,
of a tactic you're finding successful. Benitez thought about it for a
moment, and said:


> "We're working on codes of conduct for the food industry. What we

> did was take a bunch of different codes, and adapted them to

> Immokalee. We discussed the codes, talked about monitoring agencies

> and standards."

>

> "From documents that had nothing to do with Immokalee, we made our

> own. And that's important. We're not children, we are people, we are

> workers. We know how to think, and how to see about our own

> development. We don't need some professor to do it for us."

>

> "We started off with someone raising their hand in a meeting saying

> 'Why don't we do a boycott?' So we discussed who to boycott, and

> someone else said because no-one knew who Pacific or Six L's were,

> we should take on Taco Bell. So for four years, we campaigned around

> that."

>

> "It was a bit crazy for 10 people to take on such a big campaign. I

> remember being at a Labor Notes meeting talking about the boycott,

> and a Teamster came up to me and told me 'You're nuts'."

>

> But when we got our first agreement, with Taco Bell, we felt like

> the first man on the moon. We didn't think it would have been

> possible just four years before. And for us, it was one small step

> for a man, but one giant leap for mankind. We opened the door so

> that others could follow."


The tomato industry has its own voluntary code -- Socially
Responsible Farm Employers (SAFE). Many of the firms that bought their
tomatoes from slave-labor gangs were, and continue to be, certified as
SAFE. The code urges compliance with all existing laws.

Among those laws are ones that deny farm workers the right to
organize, and the right to overtime pay. According to Benitez, the
SAFE code was written far from the eyes of farmworkers "by people who
never worked in a field, by coyotes in suits. We've said clearly that,
in order for a code to be legitimate, we have to participate in it."

The tomato growers in Immokalee know the tradition they're in. "I
once heard a grower say that it began with African slaves, then they
were free but were turned into sharecroppers, and now we've got
Mexicans", Benitez said.

"We're just as disposable as slaves in the past. But that's why one
of our slogans is this: 'Yo No Soy Tractor' -- 'I'm not a tractor'.
And in the struggle against these companies, our biggest weapon was
our reality."

They've got their eyes on the bigger picture too.

"If we had the resources, we wouldn't fight only about tomatoes" he
continued. "But it's the largest crop here, and we're stretched thin,
so that's what we focus on. We're creating a precedent, but we hope
that workers in other industries can benefit -- Smithfield
[meatpacking] workers for instance, or people who pick lettuce."

It was an inspirational trip, and it's clearly in everyone's interest
that the kind of apartheid that characterizes American agriculture
(more than other industries) come to an end. The tides of history
turned against Apartheid. They will turn against the injustice in the
fields. The question isn't whether it will happen, but what comes next.

In South Africa, the post-Apartheid government has presided over a
decline in welfare, an increase in crime and violence against women,
and a resurgence of xenophobic politics. The CIW is offering a very
different avenue out of the politics of the plantation. It's something
we can all learn from.



More information about the Corporation-Watch mailing list