[games_access] GDC 2008: VERY Bad News

[John Bannick]

Robert,

No. Not at all. It's just one of my standard disclaimers. Been using it for 
years.

jhb

At 12:57 PM 12/1/2007, you wrote:
>Hi John.  I hope that you don't think anyone thinks that consensus is going
>around about " Am neither stupid nor lazy."
>
>Robert
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: games_access-bounces at igda.org [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org]
>On Behalf Of John Bannick
>Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 11:05 AM
>To: IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [games_access] GDC 2008: VERY Bad News
>
>Reid is right.
>
>There are developers right now who want their work to be accessible.
>
>This SIG could right now facilitate that by:
>
>1. Providing, distributing, and publicizing a concise, specific set of
>functional criteria that define what means accessible.
>2. Compiling, publishing, and publicizing an annual list of which companies
>and games meet those criteria.
>3. Maintaining a forum (The currently rather drifting Game Accessibility
>Project comes to mind) where developers can go for immediate help.
>
>I'm a developer of games that are accessible.
>Have shipped 22 different revenue-generating products in a wide variety of
>vertical markets in the last 30 years.
>Am neither stupid nor lazy.
>And don't see any of the 3 above items.
>
>None of the 3 items should take long to build as a first cut.
>
>And if not from this SIG, then from where?
>
>John Bannick
>CTO
>7-128 Software
>
>
>At 02:26 AM 12/1/2007, you wrote:
> >Please, can we stop with the negative talk about GDC and the game
> >industry? I work in the game industry for LucasArts. Just last week I
> >talked to a highly respected programmer and he's 100% behind us and
> >wants to talk about what we can do to improve accessibility in our
> >games after our current milestone is finished. There are dozens of
> >people at LucasArts that support game accessibility. Nintendo totally
> >gets it, EA Games totally gets it with their Family Play modes in
> >their sports games. Peter Molyneux gets it, Will Wright... the list
> >goes on and on.
> >
> >It's offensive to me when people of this SIG accuse developers of not
> >caring because WE DO CARE. The last thing you want to do is insult the
> >people you have to work with. It's the quickest way to turn them away
> >from our cause.
> >
> >So, instead of complaining, lets do something about it! First,
> >everyone here needs to understand what it's like for developers and
> >why it's so hard for them to adopt accessibility features.
> >
> >1. Limited financial resources - Games are very expensive to make and
> >any new features adds to the cost. Before you can add accessibility
> >features you must have a game and that's where most of the money is
> >spent first.
> >
> >2. Limited time - Game development is incredibly complex and hard to
> >tame. No matter how much extra time gets budgeted into the production
> >schedule, it always runs out well before all tasks are complete. When
> >this happens, features get cut in order to save the core of the game
> >and again, without a game, there can't be any accessibility features.
> >Because this usually happens so late, there isn't enough time to work
> >on accessibility features before the game has to ship.
> >
> >3. Limited information - Even if a developer was pro-active and
> >scheduled the development of accessibility features into the games'
> >development schedule, there's still a major lack of knowledge and
> >tools that enable them to do their job. The SIG has been thinking
> >about accessibility features for years and we have all the solutions,
> >but developers don't yet. We need to make ourselves known and readily
> >available to help them.
> >
> >What can we do to solve these issues? We need to develop our
> >relationships with developers and offer our assistance. Our attempts
> >to work with GarageGames is a good start. When a new game is announced
> >we should contact them and offer our expertise.
> >
> >We have GOT to get a website up so that we can communicate our
> >abilities and expertise to our target audiences (game developers).
> >
> >But there are technical issues and many of us are volunteers and so
> >things move very slowly.
> >
> >Several of us are writing guidelines for implementing certain features
> >but again, this is a slow process. Others are doing research. Going to
> >conferences is awesome. Writing articles to Gamasutra is great as
> >well.
> >
> >Eitan is right, we have to "sell" our expertise. It's not that
> >developers don't care, they don't know that they SHOULD care.
> >
> >-Reid
> >_______________________________________________
> >games_access mailing list
> >games_access at igda.org
> >http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> >
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.11/1161 - Release Date:
> >11/30/2007 12:12 PM
>
>_______________________________________________
>games_access mailing list
>games_access at igda.org
>http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>_______________________________________________
>games_access mailing list
>games_access at igda.org
>http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.12/1163 - Release Date: 
>12/1/2007 12:05 PM