[games_access] games_access Digest, Vol 81, Issue 31

BlazeEagle blazeeagle at suddenlink.net
Mon Dec 13 07:23:44 EST 2010


"differently abled" is dorky & too "politically correct" sounding. sheesh! 
lol

Aaron

--------------------------------------------------
From: <games_access-request at igda.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 2:10 PM
To: <games_access at igda.org>
Subject: games_access Digest, Vol 81, Issue 31

> Send games_access mailing list submissions to
> games_access at igda.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> games_access-request at igda.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> games_access-owner at igda.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of games_access digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Terminology (Steve Spohn)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:01:45 -0500
> From: "Steve Spohn" <steve at ablegamers.com>
> Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
> To: "'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'"
> <games_access at igda.org>
> Message-ID: <003f01cb9965$dba659d0$92f30d70$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> No lol
>
> Steve Spohn
> Associate Editor
> The AbleGamers Foundation
>
> www.ablegamers.com
> www.ablegamers.org
>
> Find me on Skype!  Username: Steve_Spohn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: games_access-bounces at igda.org [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org] 
> On Behalf Of Sandra Uhling
> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 6:05 AM
> To: 'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
>
> Hi,
> Maybe that is the new point  of view:
> "It is about ability" :-)
>
> UNICEF has a series of books about it.
> It is for kids and for education.
>
> Best regards,
> Sandra
>
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: games_access-bounces at igda.org [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org] 
> Im Auftrag von Ryan Arndt
> Gesendet: Montag, 6. Dezember 2010 18:19
> An: IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List
> Betreff: Re: [games_access] Terminology
>
> curious how people view the term "differently abled" as when I did my 
> degree (BEd), this was the term of choice. What do you think?
>
> Ryan Arndt
> IGDA Global Community Manager
>
> On 2010-12-04, at 7:59 PM, Michelle Hinn wrote:
>
>
> I guess because of my age, I went through the 1970 
> "handicapped/handicappible" argument where some with disabilities felt 
> that handicappable was a preferable term. So whenever I hear handicapped, 
> I think back to those years (it was something on 70s children/teen TV, 
> etc). After that seemed to be the search for a new term -- whether that 
> was something that was pushed by the disabled community or those without 
> disabilities? I do not know. I've just met many, unlike yourself, who have 
> an issue with the term. So perhaps it's an age thing?
>
> Perhaps my own reference to being a "person with a disability" (rather 
> than "disabled person" comes from both my academic background as well as 
> the fact that one of my disabilities is medical (and later made medically 
> worse and causing physical limitations) when being treated for the 
> "cure"). That's a very good possibility!
>
> I agree, though, disability doesn't stop and in the end whatever term 
> anyone wants to use about themselves, is ok.
>
> I think, however, when it comes to cognitive disorders, cognitive or 
> learning "handicaps" is problematic. Mainly because terms like "disorder," 
> "disabilities," "limitation," etc seems to sound better than "handicap." 
> And, yes, I have a learning disability. :)
>
> Michelle
>
> On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Steve Spohn wrote:
>
>
>
> I?ve found very few who dislike handicapped (U.S. thing maybe) ? even golf 
> uses handicap as in ?a disadvantage.?   Mark prefers to say ?gamer with 
> disability? due to people complaining but used to say disabled gamer.  I 
> still say disabled gamer but that?s because I avoid medical/academic 
> sounding phrases at all costs.
>
> No fight from my end, I?m just stating ?person first? is GREAT in a 
> hospital.  I hated when Drs referred to me as ?kidney in bed 8? but in 
> real life I think the disability is imposed on the person.  Therefore, 
> saying person with disability is attaching it to who I am.  Barrie hates 
> handicap as do most UK?ers, so we try to avoid it.  However, you, Mark, 
> Aaron, and I are handicapped (and in the U.S.) so the word doesn?t have 
> negative connotations.  So, all I can add is:
>
> 1.       Being disabled never stops
> a.       There is no break but you can conquer barriers
> 2.       Don?t say cripple or gimp
> a.       Notice broadened horizons is ?GimpGear.us? but promotes BH
> 3.       Handicapped is iffy
> a.       Never met someone in the U.S. who is disabled who minds handicap
> b.      U.K. people dislike it
> 4.       Those who are disabled are more hardened against words
> 5.       Person first is personal preference but it is more often used by 
> academics and medical people
>
> Steve Spohn
> Associate Editor
> The AbleGamers Foundation
>
> www.ablegamers.com <x-msg://60/www.ablegamers.com>
> www.ablegamers.org <x-msg://60/www.Ablegamers.org>
>
> Find me on Skype!  Username: Steve_Spohn
>
> From: games_access-bounces at igda.org [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org] 
> On Behalf Of Michelle Hinn
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 9:55 PM
> To: IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
>
> Mark, though, refers to himself as a someone with a disability -- perhaps 
> he means to say that something about gaming makes him "disabled" but 
> outside of that activity he is not disabled?
>
> Not trying to start a list fight -- just trying to understand where 
> disability starts and stops for you personally. Do you feel that 
> "handicapped" is interchangeable with disability as well? The discussion 
> had started with "handicapped" as a potentially offensive term so I was 
> just looking for your opinion as to whether you found to it worthwhile to 
> differentiate the two or if you found the two terms to be interchangeable.
>
> Not sure I agree that by saying "person with a disability" is akin to 
> saying that disability is an accessory -- it's just a preference as to how 
> the individual wants to be referred to by others as.
>
> Michelle
>
> On Dec 4, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Steve Spohn wrote:
>
>
> It?s like anything, someone will always be upset.  It would, however, be 
> doable to create an agreed-upon what NOT to say list.
>
> As an aside, there is a trend in the disabled community which is similar 
> to most communities; those who ARE handicapped/disabled are much much less 
> sensitive to the term used than those who are not.  The ?inclusive? 
> mindset is very prevalent in every country now-a-days, i.e. ?I can say I?m 
> ABC but you can?t because I actually am an X? ? where X is a 
> race/gender/disability/nationality .
>
> Even if you read back through this list?s ?in-fights? those who aren?t 
> disabled get much more defensive than those who are.
>
> Personal preferences aside, I think as long as you don?t use words you 
> KNOW will hurt someone, you?re PC enough.  AG gets scolded from time to 
> time over the ?person first? aspect.  Mark, our CEO, is trying to say 
> gamer with disabilities, while I continue to say disabled gamer.  Why? 
> Because I?m disabled.  I?m not ?defining? myself, I?m being factual.  I 
> will always be disabled, ergo, I?m a disabled <insert verb>.  So, for 
> once, I am very much on Barrie?s side: life made me disabled, it?s not an 
> accessory like a hat.  Take away what stops me from a given activity and 
> I?m not disabled ? well other than that whole wheelchair & ventilator 
> thing.
>
> Steve Spohn
> Associate Editor
> The AbleGamers Foundation
>
> www.ablegamers.com <x-msg://60/www.ablegamers.com>
> www.ablegamers.org <x-msg://60/www.Ablegamers.org>
>
> Find me on Skype!  Username: Steve_Spohn
>
> From: games_access-bounces at igda.org [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org] 
> On Behalf Of Michelle Hinn
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 7:05 PM
> To: IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
>
> A K-12 student is a student who is pre-university and/or still in 
> government required schooling.
>
> The "K" is for Kindergarten, from the German word "Children's Garden." :) 
> It's an early childhood education term for a "pre-school" like setting. 
> The term is used mostly in North America.
>
> As far as a black/white list goes, I'm not sure it's possible to come up 
> with a list that is, well, black/white. I think we could come closer to 
> creating a list of terms that are regionally considered offensive than we 
> could come up with a regional list that is "ok." However, as we've seen 
> from the discussion, it is often up to the individual as to what they 
> themselves use to describe themselves (ie, "handicapped" versus 
> "disabled") and how they choose to describe themselves (ie, as "disabled" 
> or as a "person with a disability").
>
> There are no easy solutions. The same can be said for other issues such as 
> terms, particularly slang terms, for race, sexuality, gender, etc.
>
> Michelle
>
> On Dec 4, 2010, at 5:31 PM, Sandra Uhling wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> so when we would make a black and white list, we should make separate ones 
> for different regions?
>
> What is a K-12 student?
>
> Best regards,
> Sandra
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Von: "Michelle Hinn" <hinn at uiuc.edu>
> Gesendet: 05.12.2010 00:11:46
> An: "IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List" <games_access at igda.org>
> Betreff: Re: [games_access] Terminology
>
> True, Lynsey -- Handicapped  as "Cap in Hand" is more of a UK concern 
> (correct, Barrie?) than it is a US concern.
> I'm not sure I understand how Hasbro got away with a Transformer game 
> called "spastic" even in the US -- that's a term used as an insult by many 
> a K-12 student (and above sometimes!). Perhaps it's losing it's luster as 
> an insult!?!
> Michelle
>
> On Dec 4, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Lynsey Graham wrote:
>
>
> I think one of the things that makes it more awkward is that the way words 
> are percieved varies so much from region to region, even in the same 
> language - never mind when you start translating to many languages.    For 
> example, while still unpleasant, 'spastic' and 'spazz' doesn't seem to be 
> regarded as offensive in the US as it is in the UK - I've heard it used in 
> a lot of US shows, including children's shows (hello Bratz).  I know 
> Nintendo managed to get two games pulled from the shelves in the UK that 
> featured the word (including Mario Party 8), and Hasbro recently launched 
> a Transformer called Spastic (which won't be released in the UK). 
> Obviously that's a slightly more exteme example, but we really don't want 
> to unintentionally offend anyone.
>
> It's quite a challenge when you're working on a product that will be 
> released across many regions!
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Steve Spohn [mailto:steve at ablegamers.com]
> To: 'BlazeEagle' [mailto:blazeeagle at suddenlink.net], 'IGDA Games 
> Accessibility SIG Mailing List' [mailto:games_access at igda.org]
> Sent: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:43:09 +0000
> Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
>
> Exactly, Aaron. According to those who have scolded AG it should be "X
> challenged" "persons with disabilities" and "persons with limitations" - I
> say Disabled gamer a lot as it's what I am. Barrie is correct in the
> "people first" is awkward and attaches negativity. Everyone has a
> sensitivity to certain words but most of the disabled individuals I've met
> despise "cripple" and some hate "gimp."
>
> I've never had someone object to disabled and only a few on handicapped.
>
> Steve Spohn
> Associate Editor
> The AbleGamers Foundation
>
> www.ablegamers.com <http://www.ablegamers.com/>
> www.ablegamers.org <http://www.ablegamers.org/>
>
> Find me on Skype! Username: Steve_Spohn
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: games_access-bounces at igda.org [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org]
> On Behalf Of BlazeEagle
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 4:55 PM
> To: games_access at igda.org
> Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
>
> I personally don't find it that offensive but each person has their own
> preference. For physical disability, is "physically challenged" more 
> "P.C."?
>
> For visual disabilities, How about "visually challenged" for visual
> disabilities?
>
> It really just boils down to semantics & how sensitive one is.
>
> Aaron
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: <games_access-request at igda.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 12:11 PM
> To: <games_access at igda.org>
> Subject: games_access Digest, Vol 81, Issue 4
>
> > Send games_access mailing list submissions to
> > games_access at igda.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > games_access-request at igda.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > games_access-owner at igda.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of games_access digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Terminology (Lynsey Graham)
> > 2. Re: Terminology (Sandra Uhling)
> > 3. Re: Terminology (Lynsey Graham)
> > 4. Re: Terminology (Barrie Ellis)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:25:14 -0000
> > From: "Lynsey Graham" <lgraham at blitzgamesstudios.com>
> > Subject: [games_access] Terminology
> > To: "'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'"
> > <games_access at igda.org>
> > Message-ID:
> > <7388601b-854b-41ec-8428-9794278692e2 at blitzgamesstudios.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I was wondering if I could ask for advice. I've just moved onto a
> > project, and noticed that one of the lines of dialogue refers to
> > 'handicapped people'. From what I've gathered, quite a few people find
> > this term offensive - is this generally the case? We're trying to decide
> > whether to cut the line, or whether to keep it (as some people on the 
> > team
>
> > have never heard that it's offensive).
> >
> > Any feedback would be much appreciated!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Lynsey
> >
> > Lynsey Graham
> > Designer | Blitz Games
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- 
> >
> > IMPORTANT INFORMATION
> >
> > Information and any attached documentation from Blitz Games Studios
> > Limited (including its divisions: Blitz Games, Volatile Games, Blitz
> > Arcade, TruSim & BlitzTech) is intended for the use of the addressee 
> > only
> > and may contain confidential information.
> >
> > If you are not the intended recipient please delete this email and 
> > notify
> > us immediately.
> >
> > Please note that without the prior written consent of Blitz Games 
> > Studios
> > Limited any form of distribution, copying or use of this email or the
> > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> >
> > Attachments to this email may accidentally contain software viruses. You
> > are advised to take all reasonable precautions to minimise this risk and
> > to carry out a virus check on any attachments before they are opened.
> >
> > Any formal offer contained in this email is subject to the standard 
> > terms
> > & conditions of Blitz Games Studios Limited and must be signed by both
> > parties. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author
> > and do not necessarily represent those of Blitz Games Studios Limited.
> >
> > Blitz Games Studios Limited is registered in England (company no:
> > 2482913). Its registered address is Regent Square House, The Parade,
> > Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 4NL, UK
> >
> > ***********
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> >
> <http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/private/games_access/attachments/20101203
> /13f319e7/attachment.html>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:44:14 +0100
> > From: "Sandra Uhling" <sandra_uhling at web.de>
> > Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
> > To: "'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'"
> > <games_access at igda.org>
> > Message-ID: <004601cb9309$52353ac0$f69fb040$@de>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Hi Lynsey,
> >
> > I think this video will help you.
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVqz0LKphws&feature=player_embedded
> >
> > Maybe you can describe the situation and what kind of disability the
> > referred people have?
> >
> > A good description in general is: Persons with Disabilities, short PwDs.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Sandra
> >
> >
> > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: games_access-bounces at igda.org 
> > [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org]
> > Im
> > Auftrag von Lynsey Graham
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Dezember 2010 17:25
> > An: 'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'
> > Betreff: [games_access] Terminology
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if I could ask for advice. I?ve just moved onto a
> > project,
> > and noticed that one of the lines of dialogue refers to ?handicapped
> > people?. From what I?ve gathered, quite a few people find this term
> > offensive ? is this generally the case? We?re trying to decide whether 
> > to
> > cut the line, or whether to keep it (as some people on the team have 
> > never
> > heard that it?s offensive).
> >
> >
> >
> > Any feedback would be much appreciated!
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > Lynsey
> >
> >
> >
> > Lynsey Graham
> >
> > Designer | Blitz Games
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > -- 
> >
> > IMPORTANT INFORMATION
> >
> > Information and any attached documentation from Blitz Games Studios
> > Limited
> > (including its divisions: Blitz Games, Volatile Games, Blitz Arcade,
> > TruSim
> > & BlitzTech) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may 
> > contain
> > confidential information.
> >
> > If you are not the intended recipient please delete this email and 
> > notify
> > us
> > immediately.
> >
> > Please note that without the prior written consent of Blitz Games 
> > Studios
> > Limited any form of distribution, copying or use of this email or the
> > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> >
> > Attachments to this email may accidentally contain software viruses. You
> > are
> > advised to take all reasonable precautions to minimise this risk and to
> > carry out a virus check on any attachments before they are opened.
> >
> > Any formal offer contained in this email is subject to the standard 
> > terms
> > &
> > conditions of Blitz Games Studios Limited and must be signed by both
> > parties. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author
> > and
> > do not necessarily represent those of Blitz Games Studios Limited.
> >
> > Blitz Games Studios Limited is registered in England (company no:
> > 2482913).
> > Its registered address is Regent Square House, The Parade, Leamington 
> > Spa,
> > Warwickshire, CV32 4NL, UK
> >
> > ***********
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:06:52 -0000
> > From: "Lynsey Graham" <lgraham at blitzgamesstudios.com>
> > Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
> > To: "'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'"
> > <games_access at igda.org>
> > Message-ID:
> > <d7d7ff9c-c17f-47ed-acf2-f025896c73a1 at blitzgamesstudios.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > The line in question is:
> >
> > "Dogs are kept as pets but many also work for a living. They help out in
> > all sorts of ways from pulling sleds, herding, helping the handicapped,
> > guarding and hunting"
> >
> > It just strikes me as possibly being a bit awkwardly worded with the
> > potential to offend. Strangely, the German translation seems to just
> > refer to "f?hren Blinde", which I'm assuming is just referring to
> > blindness?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: games_access-bounces at igda.org 
> > [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org]
>
> > On Behalf Of Sandra Uhling
> > Sent: 03 December 2010 16:44
> > To: 'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'
> > Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
> >
> > Hi Lynsey,
> >
> > I think this video will help you.
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVqz0LKphws&feature=player_embedded
> >
> > Maybe you can describe the situation and what kind of disability the
> > referred people have?
> >
> > A good description in general is: Persons with Disabilities, short PwDs.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Sandra
> >
> >
> > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: games_access-bounces at igda.org 
> > [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org]
> > Im
> > Auftrag von Lynsey Graham
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Dezember 2010 17:25
> > An: 'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'
> > Betreff: [games_access] Terminology
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if I could ask for advice. I've just moved onto a
> > project,
> > and noticed that one of the lines of dialogue refers to 'handicapped
> > people'. From what I've gathered, quite a few people find this term
> > offensive - is this generally the case? We're trying to decide whether 
> > to
> > cut the line, or whether to keep it (as some people on the team have 
> > never
> > heard that it's offensive).
> >
> >
> >
> > Any feedback would be much appreciated!
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > Lynsey
> >
> >
> >
> > Lynsey Graham
> >
> > Designer | Blitz Games
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > -- 
> >
> > IMPORTANT INFORMATION
> >
> > Information and any attached documentation from Blitz Games Studios
> > Limited
> > (including its divisions: Blitz Games, Volatile Games, Blitz Arcade,
> > TruSim
> > & BlitzTech) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may 
> > contain
> > confidential information.
> >
> > If you are not the intended recipient please delete this email and 
> > notify
> > us
> > immediately.
> >
> > Please note that without the prior written consent of Blitz Games 
> > Studios
> > Limited any form of distribution, copying or use of this email or the
> > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> >
> > Attachments to this email may accidentally contain software viruses. You
> > are
> > advised to take all reasonable precautions to minimise this risk and to
> > carry out a virus check on any attachments before they are opened.
> >
> > Any formal offer contained in this email is subject to the standard 
> > terms
> > &
> > conditions of Blitz Games Studios Limited and must be signed by both
> > parties. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author
> > and
> > do not necessarily represent those of Blitz Games Studios Limited.
> >
> > Blitz Games Studios Limited is registered in England (company no:
> > 2482913).
> > Its registered address is Regent Square House, The Parade, Leamington 
> > Spa,
> > Warwickshire, CV32 4NL, UK
> >
> > ***********
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > games_access mailing list
> > games_access at igda.org
> > http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> >
> >
> > -- 
> >
> > IMPORTANT INFORMATION
> >
> > Information and any attached documentation from Blitz Games Studios
> > Limited (including its divisions: Blitz Games, Volatile Games, Blitz
> > Arcade, TruSim & BlitzTech) is intended for the use of the addressee 
> > only
> > and may contain confidential information.
> >
> > If you are not the intended recipient please delete this email and 
> > notify
> > us immediately.
> >
> > Please note that without the prior written consent of Blitz Games 
> > Studios
> > Limited any form of distribution, copying or use of this email or the
> > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> >
> > Attachments to this email may accidentally contain software viruses. You
> > are advised to take all reasonable precautions to minimise this risk and
> > to carry out a virus check on any attachments before they are opened.
> >
> > Any formal offer contained in this email is subject to the standard 
> > terms
> > & conditions of Blitz Games Studios Limited and must be signed by both
> > parties. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author
> > and do not necessarily represent those of Blitz Games Studios Limited.
> >
> > Blitz Games Studios Limited is registered in England (company no:
> > 2482913). Its registered address is Regent Square House, The Parade,
> > Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 4NL, UK
> >
> > ***********
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 17:11:45 -0000
> > From: "Barrie Ellis" <oneswitch at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
> > To: "IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List"
> > <games_access at igda.org>
> > Message-ID: <C7AC2B07E36F4F659136228847280420 at OneSwitchPC>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> > reply-type=original
> >
> > I much prefer the term Disabled Person/People, in the context that a
> > person
> > is disabled by something in their environment that poses a barrier to
> > them.
> > If a person can't get into a shop because they need to use a wheelchair,
> > then you might consider them a disabled person. If there's a ramp in
> > place,
> > that they can use, then they are no longer disabled in that particular
> > context. The same with video games.
> >
> > Saying "Person with disability", attaches the disability to them, and
> > always
> > feels like a more medical way of describing someone to me. You'll hear
> > people use the "people first" argument, but I prefer to describe people 
> > as
> > people first. Then if there's something disabling them from doing what
> > they
> > need/want to do, I would describe the person as a disabled person.
> >
> > Barrie
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Sandra Uhling" <sandra_uhling at web.de>
> > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 4:44 PM
> > To: "'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'" 
> > <games_access at igda.org>
> > Subject: Re: [games_access] Terminology
> >
> >> Hi Lynsey,
> >>
> >> I think this video will help you.
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVqz0LKphws&feature=player_embedded
> >>
> >> Maybe you can describe the situation and what kind of disability the
> >> referred people have?
> >>
> >> A good description in general is: Persons with Disabilities, short 
> >> PwDs.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Sandra
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: games_access-bounces at igda.org 
> >> [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org]
> >> Im
> >> Auftrag von Lynsey Graham
> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Dezember 2010 17:25
> >> An: 'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'
> >> Betreff: [games_access] Terminology
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >>
> >> I was wondering if I could ask for advice. I've just moved onto a
> >> project,
> >> and noticed that one of the lines of dialogue refers to 'handicapped
> >> people'. From what I've gathered, quite a few people find this term
> >> offensive - is this generally the case? We're trying to decide whether
> >> to
> >> cut the line, or whether to keep it (as some people on the team have
> >> never
> >> heard that it's offensive).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Any feedback would be much appreciated!
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >>
> >> Lynsey
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Lynsey Graham
> >>
> >> Designer | Blitz Games
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >>
> >> -- 
> >>
> >> IMPORTANT INFORMATION
> >>
> >> Information and any attached documentation from Blitz Games Studios
> >> Limited
> >> (including its divisions: Blitz Games, Volatile Games, Blitz Arcade,
> >> TruSim
> >> & BlitzTech) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may
> >> contain
> >> confidential information.
> >>
> >> If you are not the intended recipient please delete this email and 
> >> notify
> >> us
> >> immediately.
> >>
> >> Please note that without the prior written consent of Blitz Games 
> >> Studios
> >> Limited any form of distribution, copying or use of this email or the
> >> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> >>
> >> Attachments to this email may accidentally contain software viruses. 
> >> You
> >> are
> >> advised to take all reasonable precautions to minimise this risk and to
> >> carry out a virus check on any attachments before they are opened.
> >>
> >> Any formal offer contained in this email is subject to the standard 
> >> terms
> >> &
> >> conditions of Blitz Games Studios Limited and must be signed by both
> >> parties. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author
> >> and
> >> do not necessarily represent those of Blitz Games Studios Limited.
> >>
> >> Blitz Games Studios Limited is registered in England (company no:
> >> 2482913).
> >> Its registered address is Regent Square House, The Parade, Leamington
> >> Spa,
> >> Warwickshire, CV32 4NL, UK
> >>
> >> ***********
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> games_access mailing list
> >> games_access at igda.org
> >> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > games_access mailing list
> > games_access at igda.org
> > http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> >
> >
> > End of games_access Digest, Vol 81, Issue 4
> > *******************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>
> Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3293 - Release Date: 12/03/10
> 02:34:00
>
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> -- 
>
> IMPORTANT INFORMATION
>
> Information and any attached documentation from Blitz Games Studios 
> Limited (including its divisions: Blitz Games, Volatile Games, Blitz 
> Arcade, TruSim & BlitzTech) is intended for the use of the addressee only 
> and may contain confidential information.
>
>
> If you are not the intended recipient please delete this email and notify 
> us immediately.
>
> Please note that without the prior written consent of Blitz Games Studios 
> Limited any form of distribution, copying or use of this email or the 
> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> Attachments to this email may accidentally contain software viruses. You 
> are advised to take all reasonable precautions to minimise this risk and 
> to carry out a virus check on any attachments before they are opened.
>
> Any formal offer contained in this email is subject to the standard terms 
> & conditions of Blitz Games Studios Limited and must be signed by both 
> parties. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author 
> and do not necessarily represent those of Blitz Games Studios Limited.
>
> Blitz Games Studios Limited is registered in England (company no: 
> 2482913).  Its registered address is Regent Square House, The Parade, 
> Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 4NL, UK
>
> ***********
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>
>
> <https://img.web.de/p.gif>
> WEB.DE <http://WEB.DE/>  DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 ?/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit
> gratis Notebook-Flat! http://produkte.web.de/go/DSL_Doppel_Flatrate/2 
> <http://produkte.web.de/go/DSL_Doppel_Flatrate/2>
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>
> Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3295 - Release Date: 12/04/10 
> 14:34:00
>
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>
> Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3295 - Release Date: 12/04/10 
> 14:34:00
>
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>
>
> Ryan Arndt
> Acting Community Manager
> International Game Developers Association
> Website: http://www.igda.org
> Email: ryan at igda.org
>
> LinkedIn: http://j.mp/IGDAli
> Facebook: http://j.mp/IGDAfb
> Twitter: @igda/@certainlysocial
> http://facebook.com/ryan80e
> Skype: ryanarndt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3309 - Release Date: 12/11/10 
> 02:34:00
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>
> End of games_access Digest, Vol 81, Issue 31
> ******************************************** 




More information about the games_access mailing list