[MacLoggerContest] Any other topics?

[John Bastin]

On Feb 26, 2005, at 5:36 PM, K1GQ wrote:

> On 2005 Feb 26, at 17:22, Jonathan G0DVJ wrote:
>
>> I think as someone observed, big multi-multi groups are relatively 
>> small in number and have existing systems that they employ already - 
>> hence the market there is probably too small to warrant 
>> consideration.
>
> I must have missed that observation.  It's wrong in that the "market" 
> is no smaller than in any other category -- with one caveat:  it can't 
> be an all-or-nothing choice.  I want to be able to take my Powerbook 
> loaded with MLC to KC1XX, plug in an ethernet cable, and have it Just 
> Work with the CT messaging protocol.  I wouldn't be interested in an 
> MLC design that fails to consider networks of computers running MLC 
> and/or other contest logging programs.
>
>   Bill, K1GQ

I'll put in a second to that request. For maximum usefulness, we need 
to be compatible in data formats and transfer protocols with what's 
already out there.

73,
John E Bastin, K8AJS
jbastin at sssnet.com
http://www.qsl.net/k8ajs/