[sbe-eas] Value of broadcaster EAS participation

[Stephen Weber]

Jim, you caught the short-circuit in my brain; I meant CEM. Guess my brain locked on that because we had to use CEM for abductions before CAE was added to the repertoire eons ago...

Thanks!
Steve
  From: James Gorman 
  Date: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:33 PM
  To: Stephen Weber ; SBE EAS Exchange - a mail list for discussion about the Emergency Alert System and other emergency communication issues. 
  Subject: Re: [sbe-eas] Value of broadcaster EAS participation


        Steve:
            Why did they use CAE which is Child Abduction emergency.

        Jim Gorman
        Gorman-Redlich Mfg. Co.
        www.gorman-redlich.com
        257 W. Union St.
        Athens, OH 45701
        phone 740-593-3150

        --- On Thu, 12/9/10, Stephen Weber <srweber at nvbell.net> wrote:


          From: Stephen Weber <srweber at nvbell.net>
          Subject: [sbe-eas] Value of broadcaster EAS participation
          To: sbe-eas at sbe.org
          Date: Thursday, December 9, 2010, 7:56 PM


          This article may be of interest to many as it points up a big reason that broadcaster participation in EAS will always be of major value; namely that "stuff" happens.  A CAE was sent to alert the area of this little problem:

          http://www.rgj.com/article/20101209/NEWS07/12090333/1321/news

          Happy holidays to all!
          Steve Weber
          Reno

          -----Inline Attachment Follows-----


          _______________________________________________
          sbe-eas mailing list
          sbe-eas at sbe.org
          http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe-eas
       

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/sbe-eas/attachments/20101209/7dcefc46/attachment.htm>