[sbe-eas] Wrong People

W2XJ w2xj at nyc.rr.com
Thu Nov 10 10:59:50 EST 2011


I am surprised that a major station would have left it out of it's
carriage agreement. It is really silly to see a cable company step of
real coverage of the same event. It happens often with weather events.
That is why my locals are all OTA.

On 11/10/11 10:47 AM, Frank Lucia wrote:

> There is also a legal side to this as a cable company has obligations

> to the entity that granted it a franchise to operate.

> And so it goes.

>

> --- On *Thu, 11/10/11, Bill.Westfall at cox.com

> /<Bill.Westfall at cox.com>/* wrote:

>

>

> From: Bill.Westfall at cox.com <Bill.Westfall at cox.com>

> Subject: Re: [sbe-eas] Wrong People

> To: sbe-eas at sbe.org

> Date: Thursday, November 10, 2011, 10:24 AM

>

> From an in the cable trenches perspective//: Now that the

> transition to digital is complete it is increasingly difficult for

> cable companies to selectively pass certain channels for reasons

> already indicated.

>

> However there is an even more important reason that it might be

> advisable to decide to not pass broadcast channels. In our case we

> are located in a county in California adjacent to the LA market.

> While all the LA stations seem to pass the Los Angles County

> alerts just fine, many if not all of them do not seem to monitor

> all of LP1 and LP2 stations in the counties that their signals

> reach. So if our local governments transmit an EAS message it may

> or may not be carried by the Los Angles County Stations. Since our

> obligation under the rules requires us to participate in our local

> county plan and not the plan for Los Anglers County we need to

> make sure that we cover local alerts, even when the local

> broadcast stations do not interrupt programming.

>

> From a broadcaster's perspective I would imagine it would be

> impractical for them to carry all RMT for all counties that they

> cover as well as the flood of alerts that might arise in

> individual counties during say a severe weather event. And while

> the broadcasters may participate in the their counties plan, I

> have been attending our county meetings since around 97 and have

> yet to see anyone from any of the major networks in the LA market.

> Our compromise is that on our details page we indicate that

> viewers should tune to TV and radio stations for updated news

> since the EAS system itself does an incredibly bad job of

> providing specific information on it's own and needs the

> broadcasters to provide any useful details as to what is occurring.

>

> Oh and I finally have something I can respond to on this list, so

> I thank you for the opportunity.

>

> www

>

>

> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

>

> _______________________________________________

> sbe-eas mailing list

> sbe-eas at sbe.org

> <http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sbe-eas@sbe.org>

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe-eas

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> sbe-eas mailing list

> sbe-eas at sbe.org

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe-eas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/sbe-eas/attachments/20111110/ae96aa8b/attachment.htm>


More information about the sbe-eas mailing list