[sbe-eas] Subject: Re: PEP Stations
Clay Freinwald
k7cr at blarg.net
Sun Feb 5 21:47:10 EST 2012
Frankly, I feel the discussion we should be having should be about how to
get 100% participation by stations to air EAS messages that involve the
saving of lives in their area. Especially since the FCC nixed GMC or the
BWWG alternative.
Clay
-----Original Message-----
From: sbe-eas-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-eas-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of
Adrienne Abbott
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 11:33 AM
To: w2xj at w2xj.net; 'SBE EAS Exchange - a mail list for discussion about the
Emergency Alert System and other emergency communication issues.'
Subject: Re: [sbe-eas] Subject: Re: PEP Stations
And it's a discussion we should be having because it's a more realistic
possibility than an all-out thermo-nuclear war between the US and China or
Russia. I know PEP was built during the Cold War in response to the doomsday
scenario, but the world has changed and our need for last-ditch
communications has changed with it. We can't limit our ideas, resources and
thinking about EAS, EAN's and PEP stations to just one unlikely possibility.
We need to keep it real.
Adrienne
"Radio burps, it cries, it needs to be fed all the time, it requires
constant attention, but we love it." Jim Aaron WGLN
-----Original Message-----
From: sbe-eas-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-eas-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of
W2XJ
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 11:08 AM
To: SBE EAS Exchange - a mail list for discussion about the Emergency Alert
System and other emergency communication issues.
Subject: Re: [sbe-eas] Subject: Re: PEP Stations
Actually EMP is generated in the Ionosphere and would not be conducted
upward to geosynchronous space craft. What would happen over a limited
amount of geography on the ground is a different discussion.
_______________________________________________
sbe-eas mailing list
sbe-eas at sbe.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe-eas
More information about the sbe-eas
mailing list