[casual_games] RE: Casual_Games Digest, Vol 2, Issue 25
Kim Pallister
kimpall at microsoft.com
Wed Aug 31 12:50:56 EDT 2005
Hi Brent,
I like John's "bootstrapping" approach.
Maybe for a project or two, give up the IP to the publisher in exchange
for some agreement about how your studio is prominently given credit?
In terms of selling your management on the "build it after they've
bought it" approach being wrong; I'd build a strong case of why this may
not apply like it does in other media. Skeleton of your argument might
look like this:
- Total turn-around time for non-game media production elsewhere in the
firm: (say it's 2 months for print ads or whatever it is they do)
- Development time for an advergame game, soup-to-nuts (say it's 6
months)
- Explain how clients are going to approach wanting the 2 month turn
around time, and that isn't possible unless you are already 2/3 of the
way there before they even approach you.
- Explain your crafty, innovative, idea (hey, you said they don't
understand games right?) of building an engine separate from the
content, and that you'll have a platform ready-to-go when clients
approach that (a) will let you turn projects around quicker, and (b)
will be re-usable for multiple projects.
If they don't see the logic there, well, not sure what to do then.
Kim
P.S. It's an aside, but I notice that many people use the terms casual
game and indie game interchangeably. I'd argue that's wrong and will be
increasingly wrong going forward as casual game production quality &
budgets go up.
Just my 2c.
-----Original Message-----
From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org
[mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org] On Behalf Of
casual_games-request at igda.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:03 AM
To: casual_games at igda.org
Subject: Casual_Games Digest, Vol 2, Issue 25
Send Casual_Games mailing list submissions to
casual_games at igda.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/casual_games
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
casual_games-request at igda.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
casual_games-owner at igda.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Casual_Games digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: Business Models (George Donovan)
2. RE: Business Models (Brent Lowrie)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:00:36 -0300
From: "George Donovan" <george at infiknowledge.com>
Subject: RE: [casual_games] Business Models
To: "'IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List'" <casual_games at igda.org>
Message-ID: <20050831110039.DA47CFA961 at mailwash7.pair.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
John,
How do we get Gamefiesta listed as a publisher?
_____
From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org
[mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org]
On Behalf Of John Welch
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:25 AM
To: IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List
Subject: RE: [casual_games] Business Models
Brent,
There's a middle road - work with a publisher who will fund a serious
project (take all of the risk) and give you far more exposure (it's not
just
about development) as well as ongoing participation (upside far better
than
work-for-hire). Ideas are cheap - execution counts. If you can do it
well
once, you can do it better the next time. So, get a publisher deal and
use
it to learn the ropes, build your business case, and get some name
recognition in the casual space. If you like what you see, think about
self-funding your next project. Talking from experience, starting from
scratch isn't easy - but once you have some momentum it's a heck of a
lot of
fun.
There aren't many publishers in the casual space, but there are a few of
us,
and terms are currently a lot better than "traditional"
developer-publisher
contracts. Each publisher has its personality and benefits, but I don't
think you could go wrong with any of them. There's a list of publishers
addressing this space in the SIG's 2005 white paper:
www.igda.org/casual.
-John W.
________________________
John Welch, President & CEO
PLAY: <http://www.playfirst.com/> www.PlayFirst.com
________________________
_____
From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org
[mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Lowrie
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:09 AM
To: IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List; IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing
List
Subject: RE: [casual_games] Business Models
See, this is why I joined the IGDA! thanks everyone for the replies.
It was before I discovered the IGDA and its Casual Games SIG that
researching the industry was difficult. without friends and connections
in
the industry, we found getting feedback, let alone, finding answers to
simple questions like the one I posed impossible. I can only speculate
as to
the reasons because we never once got a response. Seriously. Now, we
were
obviously knocking on the wrong doors and calling the wrong numbers.
Contact-envy aside, I appreciate the candidness of the members here and
find
the dialogue refreshing.
Brian, I definitely wish we could commit the time to cranking out a game
a
week. If it were our own games, perhaps, although our games tend to be
pretty ambitious. however, our clients just don't move that fast. I
think we
actually spend more time waiting for feedback and approvals than we do
in
development.
My question was perhaps worded poorly as well. I wasn't just curious
about
how to fill our portfolio, but rather how studios are funding their
development and the percentage of IP vs. "work-for-hire" games in their
portfolios. I am building a case for our company executive to invest
heavily
in R&D (game engine development as Brian points out and new technologies
like mobile game development) and our own commercial IP games and I find
it's a "cart-before-the-horse" kind of issue in a publicly-traded
company.
Rather than a "build it and they will come" mentality, it is more a
"find me
a funded project and we'll let you build it" sort of deal. Your comments
are
all very interesting. thanks
Its late here so I hope I am not blithering. thanks again for the
insight
folks and I look forward to future conversations here and at one of the
many
new (and established) conferences. cheers
Brent Lowrie
Games and Animation
RARE METHOD
500, 1812 4th Street S.W. Calgary AB T2S 1W1
P. 403.543.4500 x341 F. 403.532.3004
www.raremethod.com
games.raremethod.com
Strategic Interactive Marketing
Provoke Thought Direct Action Get Results
_____
From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org on behalf of Brian Robbins
Sent: Tue 8/30/2005 8:32 PM
To: IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List
Subject: RE: [casual_games] Business Models
I agree with Wade on this, the purpose of this group, and the IGDA in
general is to encourage open communication between developers. While on
some
level we're all competitors I hardly see enough head to head competition
to
warrant any kind of over the top secrecy.
Having myself worked both for a tiny casual game developer, and now
growing
the game team at a leading advergame developer, the best way I've seen
to
develop a library of games is to dedicate yourself to doing it. At
CleverMedia we had a long standing production cycle of a new game EVERY
week. We missed a week occasionally for holidays, etc. but for several
years
we released a new game every Thursday. The result is that CleverMedia
now
has one of, if not the, largest 1st party catalogs of games anywhere.
Here at Fuel our strategy is to develop our own games as customizable
and
open as we possibly can. In essence we are not building a game, rather
we
are building a game engine and a game utilizing that engine at the same
time. Once we have a solid engine, and a wicked game developed using it,
we
can leverage both to become profitable. Perhaps one of the best examples
of
this is Laser Envy (http://www.fuelarcade.com/laserenvy/) and another
game
utilizing the same underlying engine we built for MegaBloks
(http://www.megabloks.com/en/kids/dragons/game/fire_and_ice.php).
This can be a bit risky in that it takes a good deal more effort to
build a
game engine than it does to build just a game. However when it works
right
it can be very successful and rewarding for the team and the company.
--
Brian Robbins
Director, Online Gaming
http://www.fuelgames.com/blog/
Chair, IGDA Online Games SIG & IGDA Casual Games SIG
http://www.igda.org/online/ http://www.igda.org/casual/
-----Original Message-----
From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org
[mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org]On
Behalf Of Brent Lowrie
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:44 AM
To: IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List
Subject: [casual_games] Business Models
I know this is a topic that many are interested in but few are really
willing to talk about. We are all competitors after all.
We are a relatively small game development group fighting to establish
some
independence within an interactive marketing firm. As the group leader,
I
have been putting together a business plan of sorts and would like to
field
some questions for those established developers with many games in their
portfolio. How did you go about producing so many games? That is, was it
self-funded internal development in the hopes of licensing them? Were
they
games developed for clients that you retained rights too and now offer a
non-branded version for licensing? A combination?
_______________________________________________
Casual_Games mailing list
Casual_Games at igda.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/casual_games
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/casual_games/attachments/20050831/15
7a183c/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 07:51:55 -0600
From: "Brent Lowrie" <brent.lowrie at raremethod.com>
Subject: RE: [casual_games] Business Models
To: "IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List" <casual_games at igda.org>
Message-ID:
<863ACBAE9764BF44921E6EE6578741D6077DBD at gearbox.raremethod>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks John!
This is the sort of info I am looking for. Excellent. Thanks!
I actually edited the case studies on the latest white paper. It's been
a while since I read the first draft and haven't had a chance to read
the completed version. Pardon me if my question is answered there. What
does a publishing deal typically look like? Do they vary wildly or are
they all pretty standard across the board and from publisher to
publisher? Thanks in advance...
Brent Lowrie
Games & Animation
RARE METHOD
500, 1812 4th Street S.W. Calgary AB T2S 1W1
P. 403.543.4500 x341 F. 403.532.3004
www.raremethod.com
games.raremethod.com
Strategic Interactive Marketing
Provoke Thought Direct Action Get Results
________________________________
From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org
[mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org] On Behalf Of John Welch
Sent: August 31, 2005 1:25 AM
To: IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List
Subject: RE: [casual_games] Business Models
Brent,
There's a middle road - work with a publisher who will fund a serious
project (take all of the risk) and give you far more exposure (it's not
just about development) as well as ongoing participation (upside far
better than work-for-hire). Ideas are cheap - execution counts. If you
can do it well once, you can do it better the next time. So, get a
publisher deal and use it to learn the ropes, build your business case,
and get some name recognition in the casual space. If you like what you
see, think about self-funding your next project. Talking from
experience, starting from scratch isn't easy - but once you have some
momentum it's a heck of a lot of fun.
There aren't many publishers in the casual space, but there are a few of
us, and terms are currently a lot better than "traditional"
developer-publisher contracts. Each publisher has its personality and
benefits, but I don't think you could go wrong with any of them. There's
a list of publishers addressing this space in the SIG's 2005 white
paper: www.igda.org/casual.
-John W.
________________________
John Welch, President & CEO
PLAY: www.PlayFirst.com <http://www.playfirst.com/>
________________________
________________________________
From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org
[mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org] On Behalf Of Brent Lowrie
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:09 AM
To: IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List; IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing
List
Subject: RE: [casual_games] Business Models
See, this is why I joined the IGDA! thanks everyone for the replies.
It was before I discovered the IGDA and its Casual Games SIG that
researching the industry was difficult. without friends and connections
in the industry, we found getting feedback, let alone, finding answers
to simple questions like the one I posed impossible. I can only
speculate as to the reasons because we never once got a response.
Seriously. Now, we were obviously knocking on the wrong doors and
calling the wrong numbers. Contact-envy aside, I appreciate the
candidness of the members here and find the dialogue refreshing.
Brian, I definitely wish we could commit the time to cranking out a game
a week. If it were our own games, perhaps, although our games tend to be
pretty ambitious. however, our clients just don't move that fast. I
think we actually spend more time waiting for feedback and approvals
than we do in development.
My question was perhaps worded poorly as well. I wasn't just curious
about how to fill our portfolio, but rather how studios are funding
their development and the percentage of IP vs. "work-for-hire" games in
their portfolios. I am building a case for our company executive to
invest heavily in R&D (game engine development as Brian points out and
new technologies like mobile game development) and our own commercial IP
games and I find it's a "cart-before-the-horse" kind of issue in a
publicly-traded company. Rather than a "build it and they will come"
mentality, it is more a "find me a funded project and we'll let you
build it" sort of deal. Your comments are all very interesting. thanks
Its late here so I hope I am not blithering. thanks again for the
insight folks and I look forward to future conversations here and at one
of the many new (and established) conferences. cheers
Brent Lowrie
Games and Animation
RARE METHOD
500, 1812 4th Street S.W. Calgary AB T2S 1W1
P. 403.543.4500 x341 F. 403.532.3004
www.raremethod.com
games.raremethod.com
Strategic Interactive Marketing
Provoke Thought Direct Action Get Results
________________________________
From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org on behalf of Brian Robbins
Sent: Tue 8/30/2005 8:32 PM
To: IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List
Subject: RE: [casual_games] Business Models
I agree with Wade on this, the purpose of this group, and the IGDA in
general is to encourage open communication between developers. While on
some
level we're all competitors I hardly see enough head to head competition
to
warrant any kind of over the top secrecy.
Having myself worked both for a tiny casual game developer, and now
growing
the game team at a leading advergame developer, the best way I've seen
to
develop a library of games is to dedicate yourself to doing it. At
CleverMedia we had a long standing production cycle of a new game EVERY
week. We missed a week occasionally for holidays, etc. but for several
years
we released a new game every Thursday. The result is that CleverMedia
now
has one of, if not the, largest 1st party catalogs of games anywhere.
Here at Fuel our strategy is to develop our own games as customizable
and
open as we possibly can. In essence we are not building a game, rather
we
are building a game engine and a game utilizing that engine at the same
time. Once we have a solid engine, and a wicked game developed using it,
we
can leverage both to become profitable. Perhaps one of the best examples
of
this is Laser Envy (http://www.fuelarcade.com/laserenvy/) and another
game
utilizing the same underlying engine we built for MegaBloks
(http://www.megabloks.com/en/kids/dragons/game/fire_and_ice.php).
This can be a bit risky in that it takes a good deal more effort to
build a
game engine than it does to build just a game. However when it works
right
it can be very successful and rewarding for the team and the company.
--
Brian Robbins
Director, Online Gaming
http://www.fuelgames.com/blog/
Chair, IGDA Online Games SIG & IGDA Casual Games SIG
http://www.igda.org/online/ http://www.igda.org/casual/
-----Original Message-----
From: casual_games-bounces at igda.org
[mailto:casual_games-bounces at igda.org]On
Behalf Of Brent Lowrie
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:44 AM
To: IGDA Casual Games SIG Mailing List
Subject: [casual_games] Business Models
I know this is a topic that many are interested in but few are really
willing to talk about. We are all competitors after all.
We are a relatively small game development group fighting to establish
some
independence within an interactive marketing firm. As the group leader,
I
have been putting together a business plan of sorts and would like to
field
some questions for those established developers with many games in their
portfolio. How did you go about producing so many games? That is, was it
self-funded internal development in the hopes of licensing them? Were
they
games developed for clients that you retained rights too and now offer a
non-branded version for licensing? A combination?
_______________________________________________
Casual_Games mailing list
Casual_Games at igda.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/casual_games
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/casual_games/attachments/20050831/b2
0b129b/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Casual_Games mailing list
Casual_Games at igda.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/casual_games
End of Casual_Games Digest, Vol 2, Issue 25
*******************************************
More information about the Casual_Games
mailing list