[games_access] GDC 2008: VERY Bad News

Robert Florio arthit73 at cablespeed.com
Sat Dec 1 12:52:26 EST 2007

Hi John. With what you said below I think you hit the nail on the head.

Then we definitely need a web site and a forum.

-----Original Message-----
From: games_access-bounces at igda.org [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org]
On Behalf Of John Bannick
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 11:05 AM
To: IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List
Subject: Re: [games_access] GDC 2008: VERY Bad News

Reid is right.

There are developers right now who want their work to be accessible.

This SIG could right now facilitate that by:

1. Providing, distributing, and publicizing a concise, specific set of
functional criteria that define what means accessible.
2. Compiling, publishing, and publicizing an annual list of which companies
and games meet those criteria.
3. Maintaining a forum (The currently rather drifting Game Accessibility
Project comes to mind) where developers can go for immediate help.

I'm a developer of games that are accessible.
Have shipped 22 different revenue-generating products in a wide variety of
vertical markets in the last 30 years.
Am neither stupid nor lazy.
And don't see any of the 3 above items.

None of the 3 items should take long to build as a first cut.

And if not from this SIG, then from where?

John Bannick
7-128 Software

At 02:26 AM 12/1/2007, you wrote:

>Please, can we stop with the negative talk about GDC and the game

>industry? I work in the game industry for LucasArts. Just last week I

>talked to a highly respected programmer and he's 100% behind us and

>wants to talk about what we can do to improve accessibility in our

>games after our current milestone is finished. There are dozens of

>people at LucasArts that support game accessibility. Nintendo totally

>gets it, EA Games totally gets it with their Family Play modes in

>their sports games. Peter Molyneux gets it, Will Wright... the list

>goes on and on.


>It's offensive to me when people of this SIG accuse developers of not

>caring because WE DO CARE. The last thing you want to do is insult the

>people you have to work with. It's the quickest way to turn them away

>from our cause.


>So, instead of complaining, lets do something about it! First,

>everyone here needs to understand what it's like for developers and

>why it's so hard for them to adopt accessibility features.


>1. Limited financial resources - Games are very expensive to make and

>any new features adds to the cost. Before you can add accessibility

>features you must have a game and that's where most of the money is

>spent first.


>2. Limited time - Game development is incredibly complex and hard to

>tame. No matter how much extra time gets budgeted into the production

>schedule, it always runs out well before all tasks are complete. When

>this happens, features get cut in order to save the core of the game

>and again, without a game, there can't be any accessibility features.

>Because this usually happens so late, there isn't enough time to work

>on accessibility features before the game has to ship.


>3. Limited information - Even if a developer was pro-active and

>scheduled the development of accessibility features into the games'

>development schedule, there's still a major lack of knowledge and

>tools that enable them to do their job. The SIG has been thinking

>about accessibility features for years and we have all the solutions,

>but developers don't yet. We need to make ourselves known and readily

>available to help them.


>What can we do to solve these issues? We need to develop our

>relationships with developers and offer our assistance. Our attempts

>to work with GarageGames is a good start. When a new game is announced

>we should contact them and offer our expertise.


>We have GOT to get a website up so that we can communicate our

>abilities and expertise to our target audiences (game developers).


>But there are technical issues and many of us are volunteers and so

>things move very slowly.


>Several of us are writing guidelines for implementing certain features

>but again, this is a slow process. Others are doing research. Going to

>conferences is awesome. Writing articles to Gamasutra is great as



>Eitan is right, we have to "sell" our expertise. It's not that

>developers don't care, they don't know that they SHOULD care.




>games_access mailing list

>games_access at igda.org





>No virus found in this incoming message.

>Checked by AVG Free Edition.

>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.11/1161 - Release Date:

>11/30/2007 12:12 PM

games_access mailing list
games_access at igda.org

More information about the games_access mailing list