[games_access] something important I want to share

[Sandra Uhling]

Hi Barrie,

is it about "reasonable". Games are still commercial.
There is business behind. And we cannot request something
that cannot be paid. (This is also part of the CRPD)

A game that will be used only by seeing people
does not need a support for blind people.


Tomb Raider is jumping in free direction.
Special the new one, where you have an open world.
That will very difficult to realise with normal business.
I do not think that you can request them to try it.

How would a one switch Tomb Raider look like?

Best regards,
Sandra


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: games_access-bounces at igda.org [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org] Im
Auftrag von Barrie Ellis
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012 16:53
An: IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [games_access] something important I want to share

I must be honest, Sandra, that I'm not sure if I quite follow everything 
you're saying, and without reading the paper, I'll only be making guesses. 
However, personally I think all games should have a reasonably practicable 
level of accessibility myself.

I do think it wrong that a game should only offer a way in through a very 
complicated control interface. Likewise I do believe that all new and public

buildings should have wheelchair access.

I also think Tomb Raider could be made blind accessible, with a lot of 
additional assist modes (there is an audiogame inspired by Tomb Raider that 
exists - but I'm thinking more along the lines of Space Invaders for Blind -

where both games are playable simultaneously). Certainly wouldn't be an easy

thing to achieve, but I believe it's do-able, likewise a one-switch Tomb 
Raider is also a possibility.

Barrie





--------------------------------------------------
From: "Sandra Uhling" <sandra_uhling at web.de>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:14 AM
To: "'IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List'" <games_access at igda.org>
Subject: [games_access] something important I want to share

> Hello,
>
> I read a paper and I do not agree with the content.
>
> Every gamer should be able (and has the right for this)
> to play the game they like. Also when the game experience is changed or
> lost.
>
> For example DDR. It should be ok to play it like you want
> as long as it is fun (ok you should not hurt others of course)
> Play with a pad, keyboard, hand pad, ....
>
> It is wrong to think that a game need a special complex
> interface or it has to be difficulty. That is bad thinking.
>
>
> I found only three reasons "against" Accessibility.
> Serious Games:
> * the barrier is part of the aim, it is needed
> (e.g. color check, you do not need sound information here)
> * the gamers needs this skills
> (e.g. a fireman has to be able to see)
>
> AND of course it should be possible.
> (e.g. Tomb Raider for blind is not possible without making a second game)
>
>
> Best regards,
> Sandra
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> The main SIG website page is http://igda-gasig.org 

_______________________________________________
games_access mailing list
games_access at igda.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
The main SIG website page is http://igda-gasig.org