[MacLoggerContest] Any other topics?

[K1GQ]

On 2005 Feb 26, at 17:22, Jonathan G0DVJ wrote:

> I think as someone observed, big multi-multi groups are relatively 
> small in number and have existing systems that they employ already - 
> hence the market there is probably too small to warrant consideration.

I must have missed that observation.  It's wrong in that the "market" 
is no smaller than in any other category -- with one caveat:  it can't 
be an all-or-nothing choice.  I want to be able to take my Powerbook 
loaded with MLC to KC1XX, plug in an ethernet cable, and have it Just 
Work with the CT messaging protocol.  I wouldn't be interested in an 
MLC design that fails to consider networks of computers running MLC 
and/or other contest logging programs.

   Bill, K1GQ