[MacLoggerContest] Any other topics?

[Walter O'Brien, W2WJO]

wouldn't having import/export of .adif and/or cabrillo solve that 
problem for the most part? Not everybody uses CT...

I think an MLC for every possible network PC contest is raising the bar 
pretty high. Of course, if that's your requirement, then that's what 
you need. But just a great contesting package with flexibility for the 
various major contests is sure a great start. It can always be tweaked 
and added on as it goes.. start with single user, work your way up to 
multi and SO2R, etc.

IMHO 73 Walter W2WJO

On Feb 26, 2005, at 5:36 PM, K1GQ wrote:

> On 2005 Feb 26, at 17:22, Jonathan G0DVJ wrote:
>
>> I think as someone observed, big multi-multi groups are relatively 
>> small in number and have existing systems that they employ already - 
>> hence the market there is probably too small to warrant 
>> consideration.
>
> I must have missed that observation.  It's wrong in that the "market" 
> is no smaller than in any other category -- with one caveat:  it can't 
> be an all-or-nothing choice.  I want to be able to take my Powerbook 
> loaded with MLC to KC1XX, plug in an ethernet cable, and have it Just 
> Work with the CT messaging protocol.  I wouldn't be interested in an 
> MLC design that fails to consider networks of computers running MLC 
> and/or other contest logging programs.
>
>   Bill, K1GQ
>
> _______________________________________________
> MacLoggerContest mailing list
> MacLoggerContest at dogparksoftware.com
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/macloggercontest
>