[games_access] Top 3 Top 3 and IGDA GASIG Awards Ceremony 2008
d. michelle hinn
hinn at uiuc.edu
Sun Dec 2 13:16:43 EST 2007
Yep -- I have a giant list of people. The ECA (new consumer-oriented
group) has also been great about getting me email contacts for people
at companies. A friend of mine wrote me a special email program
tweaked for what I wanted so that it doesn't go out as super-spam. So
name the people/companies and I probably have their contact info or I
can find out who has it!
I used my "PR program" first for E for All -- now it should work even
better so we can send press releases just like the big companies. ;)
>Thanks, Mark - much appreciated. Robert helped too, and as I said
>before - it's just another angle to approach game developers from.
>Listening to some of Richard's concerns, I've added a "this won't
>remove all barriers for all gamers" disclaimer which I think is
>right. I'll sit on it for a short while, but then if most people are
>content/silent, I'll draft up an e-mail, and see if we can't get
>people in the group to start contacting game developers. Some help
>to track down the best contacts (Super-Michelle?, others?) - would
>be much appreciated! I'm not the most up to date... but here's some
>Pinball games: System 3 (developers of recent Gottlieb and Williams
>pinball games) - Cunning Developments / Empire (Pro Pinball - which
>had some great features on Dreamcast - including highly
>reconfigurable controls that you could map for limited one-button
>play - and speed adjustment) - Not sure about others - maybe contact
>the PinMAME emulation people.
>Golf games: Clap Hanz (the lovely Everybody's Golf - which could
>still do with some improvments), EA for Tiger Woods, Nintendo (Wii
>Sports), Super Swing Golf (?).
>Driving games: loads...
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Ioo" <ioo at ablegamers.com>
>To: "IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List" <games_access at igda.org>
>Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 4:01 PM
>Subject: Re: [games_access] Top 3 Top 3 and IGDA GASIG Awards Ceremony 2008
>>Despite what I have read to the contrary, way to go! I think the
>>posts look great and I thank you and Reid for coming up with them.
>>Your classifications and wording may not be perfect but it is far
>>more information on the web today than there was yesterday about
>>the subject. If others would like to add to list, or branch out and
>>make some new area, I am sure there is room for that as well.
>>Barrie, Reid, in short, thank you for writing something that
>>ablegamers (oh nice plug for my site) can read vs all those
>>keystrokes on something that only eight of us read (I know there
>>are more, but at this point I am sure that most people are deleting
>>most of it).
>>The blog looks great! Keep up the good work...
>>Ioo - AbleGamers.com
>>Barrie Ellis wrote:
>>>Feeling guilty - I've tweaked the IGDA GASIG blog to feature a
>>>"Blog Topics" area - which will be expanded later. I liked the
>>>look of the awards area... and thought - this is obvious, but...
>>>Why don't we start our own awards ceremony? It would be a bit of
>>>fun - and not too much work to start with I recon.
>>>Why don't we start recognising the games that have got some good
>>>accessibility features built in? We could keep nominations simple
>>>- and awards being a nice e-mail from us to the winners - any
>>>other interested press - and of course mention on our blog + site.
>>>Best pointer based game (for head-tracker / eye-tracker /
>>>Best audio game.
>>>Best one switch game.
>>>Best use of closed captions / subtitling.
>>>IGDA GASIG historical award (great games from the past).
>>>IGDA GASIG special award.
>>>IGDA GASIG best of 2008.
>>>Anyway - I've also set-up a "Top 3 Accessibility Features" section
>>>for particular game genres:
>>>Pinball, Golf, Driving games covered at present. I'd appreciate
>>>people's thoughts, and also on any suggestions of companies to
>>>contact once we have a basic consensus. I realise there's lots of
>>>things not covered - this is not the point - it's to try and get
>>>some of the simplest concepts with the lowest potential overheads
>>>to the people making games (indies, home coders, mainstream -
>>>This stuff stands on the shoulders of everyone's work so far - so
>>>please don't think I'm claiming this as my baby. It's not. It's
>>>ours - so help us to make it useful... Perhaps we should get a
>>>standard e-mail drafted (with further links for more help as it
>>>stands presently - e.g. Eelke's design patterns -
>>>Game-Accessibility.com - our forum? our mailing list and so on....
>>>Enough from me today I think...
>>>games_access mailing list
>>>games_access at igda.org
>>games_access mailing list
>>games_access at igda.org
>games_access mailing list
>games_access at igda.org
More information about the games_access